Does the government and the BBC actually believe that English = white?

I’m serious. As I read this on the road today (passenger, not driver), it did rather blow my mind.

Probe into housing ‘unfairness’

An inquiry into the “widespread perception” that immigrants are jumping housing queues is to be launched by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission.

Its head, Trevor Phillips, said the belief migrants were gaining “unfair advantages” was fuelling tensions.

And the question of “whether the housing system is being abused to the detriment of anyone – including white families” had to be finally settled.

In a speech in Birmingham, Mr Phillips said people were “realistic” about migration and accepted they had to share services such as schools and hospitals with new arrivals.

But he added: “What, however, does drive tension and hostility is a widespread public perception, that new migrants too often get an unfair advantages to which they are not entitled.

“And one area where this idea of unfairness is most frequently alleged – is in housing allocation.

“Specifically that white families are cheated out of their right to social housing by newly arrived migrants.”

At no point in their story does the BBC indicate that they, at least, understand that “English” does not equal “white”; that migrants can also be “white”; or that residents and citizens can also not be “white”. They do offer this:

He said there was “no reliable evidence to back up this claim” and public feeling was “driven by careless media and racist parties”.

He must be referring to (a) people who give speeches equating citizenship in the UK with being “white”, and/or (b) media organisations who reproduce such speeches with no insertion of common sense. Right?

Perhaps the rest of us just get to let our hair down, while the Tories rattle the chains of Enoch Powell. All things being relative, and so forth. I look forward to a resurgence in the socially-acceptable racism of newspaper articles about Gypsies, in the coming months.


1 comment so far

  1. A on

    But the English are white silly. English is are ethnicity, not a nationality.
    The ancestors of the English were MAINLY white and came from EUROPE.

    What you are refering to are non-white immigrants. Immigrants cannot call themselves English rightfully as this is a ETHNICITY not a nationality.
    For example a Welshman emigrating to South Africa wouldn’t be able to claim themselves as a Zulu would they?
    Why? Because the Zulu’s are a ETHNICITY.

    Now here’s the important part. If a immigrant becomes a BRITISH CITIZEN then yes, they have a right to call themselves BRITISH as this is their nationality.
    They wouldn’t be able to call themselves English unless they had a large degree of English ancestry (from the ENGLISH ETHNIC GROUP).

    I hope you understand this. To put it simply, you can’t just claim to be of a certain ethnicity when you are infact of another one.

    If you emigrate to the Netherlands now and call yourself Frisian be prepared to argue your case. Again, Frisian, like English is a ETHNICITY.

    thank you

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: